
| The
1997 program was organised as a joint venture between the Victorian
Division of the GSA and the ASEG (Australian Society of Exploration
Geophysicists) Victoria Branch. It was intended to reflect and build
on the increasingly closer, complementary and symbiotic relationship
that has been developing between geologists and geophysicists over
recent decades. Some of the benefits of this growing relationship
have been highlighted by the early outcomes and spin-offs from the
integrated activities based on quality airborne regional surveys such
as the VIMP programme and its Australia-wide equivalents. |
|
These
transcend the limiting aspects of tenement, state and ocean/continent
boundaries. The high quality of the speakers made it almost impossible
to pick favourites or winners in the presentation stakes. Both keynote
and case-study speakers provided ideas and illustrations on alternative
applications and directions of the integrated approach, new developments
of technologies and thoughts on future trends. It was all a real eye-opener
to the many undergraduate students in the audience! Following up on
last year's successful innovation, a small, varied, theme-related
exhibition added extra sparkle, and some nostalgia, to the proceedings. |
|
| 1997 SELWYN LECTURE: Some new integrated air and space-borne mapping technologies from the CSIRO. | |
| Dr Jonathan Huntington, CSIRO Division of Exploration and Mining | |
Introduction |
|
Significant
trends influencing the Australian minerals industry are driving the
need for major changes in mapping technologies. Amongst these are
the need for: |
|
|
|
CSIRO's
Division of Exploration and Mining (DEM) are involved in aspects of
all these issues as we strive to support the industry with tools appropriate
to exploration that must be progressively more competitive, run on
narrower margins and be environmentally and socially responsible.
This paper presents examples of some of the current work that addresses
these changes mentioned above, viz.: |
|
Trends |
Examples |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Improved
Interpretation Methods |
|
Airborne
gamma-ray surveys (radiometrics) are now routinely collected in most
airborne geophysical surveys and produced as highly informative image
maps as part of regional multi-client and state exploration initiatives.
Radiometrics may be regarded as a mature technology, but while regularly
collected it is often interpreted only in rudimentary fashion and
considerable scope exists for improvements in pre-processing and more
intelligent interpretation. Radiometric surveys now commonly collect
256 channels of data allowing the application of improved noise reduction
and modelling methods that can greatly improve the data's utility.
Interestingly, many of these methods are based on techniques for the
improvement of Landsat and remotely-sensed scanner data developed
by the CSIRO in the 1980s (Green et al. 1988; Dickson 1997 pers. comm.).
Some of the improvements gained from these methods (e.g. Hovgard 1997)
are equivalent to increasing the size of the gamma-ray detecting crystal
packs, which in turn could lead to reduced instrumentation/survey
costs. |
|
It
remains to be seen if this transpires, or whether people will just
prefer the increased detail permitted by both large crystal packs
and improved processing software. Integrating geophysical data and
vector-based geological maps in GIS systems has also demonstrated
that one can quickly undertake residual analysis methods to highlight
radioelement distributions not predicted by a model of the background
lithologies or the regolith. In this way one can highlight areas that
may have suffered increased amounts of, say, potassium metasomatism,
relative to the background. Such residual analysis methods may, in
fact, be applied to many types of surveys where one is looking for
departures from a predicted background. |
|
Mineralogical
Mapping |
|
Mineral
mapping is the non-invasive identification and mapping of rock, regolith
and alteration mineralogy using the principles of spectroscopy. It
is that facet of remote sensing that has been specifically tailored
to the needs of exploration and mining over twenty years of R &
D, largely here in Australia (Huntington 1997). Its emphasis is less
on spatial mapping of landform or structure or major litho-stratigraphic
relationships, than on the specific identification of mineralogical
composition indicative of specific formations, host rocks, alteration
zones or components of the regolith. This can now be carried out in
the field, from airborne platforms (Huntington & Boardman 1996)
and, hopefully, soon from the global vantage point of space. |
|
Mineralogical
mapping is one example of the new geological knowledge that we are
now seeing appear. The PIMA-11 hand-held technology has demonstrated
the reality of mineralogical mapping and an understanding of relationships
between mineralogy and ore systems. This has helped enormously the
understanding of what might be achievable from air- and spaceborne
platforms and why this new type of information might be valuable.
From a better understanding of the science of mineralogical mapping
we thus now need to move on to considering how best to deliver such
information in a cost-effective manner. Setting up special-purpose
companies, flying special-purpose instruments on surveys with a single
objective is getting harder and harder to justify financially. |
|
An
alternative approach to mineralogical mapping is to integrate the
collection of such data with routine airborne geophysical surveys.
To this end CSIRO is developing the prototype for a new data product
called "Airborne Mineralogy" derived from a low-flying,
profiling (non-scanning) reflectance spectrometer called OARS. This
new instrument will be flying by mid-1998 and, when refined, will
lead to the manufacture of multiple airborne instruments called GIMMS
(geophysically integrated mineral mapping spectrometer) for the airborne
geophysical market. Simulations of this new product have demonstrated
that two-dimensional maps can be made of many mineral species and
that when interpolated in the same way radiometric data are gridded,
can produce valuable image maps of the composition of host lithologies,
alteration zones and regolith components. These might include maps
of sulphate, phyllosilicate, clay, carbonate and iron oxide minerals. |
|
Cerberus |
|
As
margins for airborne geophysical surveys decrease and new technologies
come along for other airborne surveys, it makes enormous economic
sense to try to integrate more instruments into the one survey mission.
The Cerberus project, a joint venture between the Federal Government's
R & D Start program, World Geoscience Corporation and the CSIRO,
is planning to test and demonstrate that multiple instruments (which
have traditionally been flown separately) when flown together, can
bring significant reductions in data acquisition cost and benefits
from synergistic interpretation. The project aims to develop modified
instruments that can fly together without interfering with each other. |
|
Specifically
Cerberus will co-fly airborne magnetics, radiometrics, electromagnetics
(AEM) and two mineral mapping spectrometers. Clearly some technical
challenges need to be overcome, in particular with respect to the
interference generated by AEM systems, but a successful project could
mean exploration and mapping programs will get much more information
for almost the same amount of money. On the interpretation side we also anticipate learning to carry out joint-inversions of multiple data sets and joint interpretations using more than one input. For example, improved radiometric interpretations are foreseen from the ability to relate gamma-ray geochemistry (from radiometrics) with the surface distribution of specific minerals (derived from the mineral mapping spectrometers). Already analyses of selected samples showing PIMA-11 absorptions due to potassium substitution in micas have been confirmed with gamma-ray derived potassium measurements. |
|
Cerberus
will include two types of mineral mapping spectrometer: a version
of GIMMS, tailored for the Cerberus environment, and a new mid-infrared
sensor called TIPS (thermal infrared profiling spectrometer). GIMMS
operates in the visible and shortwave infrared and is suited to mapping
silicates with OH in their lattices. TIPS will concentrate on the
thermal or mid-infrared region between 8 and 1 2 micrometres, where
Si-O vibrations allow one to map many other non-OH bearing phases,
such as quartz, feldspars, olivines, pyroxenes and garnets, as well
as the carbonates. This ability has already been demonstrated with
CSIRO's MIRACO2LAS mid-infrared, active spectrometer (Whitbourn et
al. 1994). |
|
ARIES-1 |
|
The
globalisation of exploration and the dominant role by Australian companies
in energetic exploration in many countries now opening their doors
to foreign investment and new exploration strategies, brings great
opportunities for us to consider tools to better map remote, logistically
challenging regions overseas. A reduction in aircraft costs will certainly
help this, but it will always be costly and challenging to move fleets
of planes from country to country. The opportunity to learn to map
mineral distributions from space, the objective of the ARIES-1 project,
will bring further advantages in both the generation of new knowledge
and reductions in data costs. Recent simulations of ARIES products
have themselves brought to light new mineral distributions, not previously
known about, as well as demonstrated that the ARIES-1 design should
be able to deliver such new knowledge from anywhere on earth where
sufficient exposure exists (say 50% ground cover). |
|
Other
trends |
|
Three
other trends that will certainly impact on mapping and improved integrated
interpretation in the years ahead include, firstly, the potential
use of UAVs (unmanned airborne vehicles) that will allow very long
endurance airborne surveys at low altitudes eguipped with multiple
instrument arrays (Green 1997). This should, in time, further reduce
data acquisition costs. The second trend will be in the improved depth
penetration afforded by the next generation of airborne electromagnetic
sensors. Finally the long-term development of airborne gravity gradiometry
will provide real insight into the depth structure of the earth. |
|
CSIRO,
the CRC for Australian Mineral Exploration Technologies, the exploration
industry, AMIRA and the contracting industry are all combining in
developing these new methods, which should continue to revolutionise
the way we explore and map the world's geology. Over the next decade
we can be assured of new methods, increased precision and new knowledge
hopefully acquired at substantially reduced cost. |
|
Acknowledgements |
|
I
am indebted to Dr Andy Gabell of World Geoscience Corporation for
information and illustrations regarding the Cerberus project, to Dr
Bruce Dickson for information on developments in airborne radiometrics
and Dr Tim Munday for information on the application of airborne electromagnetics
methods in the regolith mapping. |
|
References |
|
GREEN,
A.A., BERMAN, M., SWITZER, P. & CRAIG, M.D., 1988. A transformation
for ordering multi-spectral data in terms of image quality with implications
for noise removal. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing
26, 65–74. HOVGAARD, J., 1997. A new processing technique for airborne gamma-ray spectrometer data (NASVD). In: Proceedings of the American Nuclear Society Symposium on Emergency Preparedness and Response, San Francisco. HUNTINGTON, J.F. & BOARDMAN, J.W., 1996. Semi-quantitative mineralogical and gealogical mapping with 1995 AVIRIS data. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Spectral Sensing Research '95 (ISSSR), 26 Nov – 1 Dec, 1995, Melbourne, Australian Government Publishing Service. HUNTINGTON, J.F., 1997. Field, air and spaceborne mineral mapping for exploration. In: Proceedings of the 38th AM IRA Annual Technical Meeting, ISBN 0908039654, E3.1–E3.12, Australian Mineral Foundation, Adelaide, 11th September, 1997. WHITBOURN, L.B., HAUSKNECHT, P., HUNTINGTON, J.F., CONNOR, P.M., CUDAHY, T.J. & PHILLIPS, R.N., 1994. Airborne CO2 laser remote sensing system. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Airborne Remote Sensing Conference and Exhibition: Applications, Technology and Science, Strasbourg, France, 12–15 September 1994, 11-94 – 11-103. |
|